How to Win with Naysayers

Naysayers

 

We all interact with naysayers. Modern mind science  can help us make those interactions more productive and positive.

Naysayers are mismatchers,  the folks who always take the opposite side of the discussion and will argue with anyone about anything. These are the folks who diss others, make snide comments,  or belittle the work or beliefs of others.  We see the behavior everywhere on social media, from the supposed gooroo whose cool angle is to diss everything he comes into contact with. Or the cantankerous negative commenter who is out to prove everyone else is wrong and they are oh so right.

For most of my life I thought such behavior was the result of bad manners, bad breeding or just plain stubbornness or an unworthiness complex the size of Manhattan. After all, most of us were taught to be polite and respectful of others, especially in public forums.  Thanks to neuroscience, I know understand the program running behind that cantankerous response.

The Expectations of Naysayers

Each of us is born with a number of innate expectations, or programs, that define our core behaviors. One of those expectations determines where we are on the scale between being a matcher (agreeing with others) and being mismatchers (taking the opposite side of any point) or naysayers. Where we end up in the spectrum of matching depends on our attention, the experiences and lessons we learn in our lives.  Some folks are total and complete matchers, some total naysayers. Then there’s everywhere in between.

Matching or mismatching in and of itself isn’t a good or bad thing. But how  we apply our tendencies can create positive or negative experiences in our lives and in the lives (and businesses) of others. For example:

  • The person who agrees with everything everyone says isn’t necessarily strong in the role of visionary and out-of-the-box thinker. They tend to conform too much for that role. However, they can be exceptional in certain roles where creating agreement is required.
  • The person who flies their flag as the naysayer extraordinaire isn’t usually a strong leader or team player. They spend too much time disagreeing with everything and everyone to create productive  teams or fuel progress. However, when you need a devil’s advocate to shoot down every single idea you have and find the holes in your plans or strategies – they fit the bill perfectly.
  • Folks who are in the middle of the spectrum tend to be more balanced- sometimes matching, sometimes mismatching.  These folks tend to deliver a more constant perspective and experience across the board.

Leading Naysayers

We all know the problems that naysayers can cause. Whether it’s constant disagreement in meetings, constant challenges in the face of progress or simply the seeming need to make themselves appear better by dissing others – a naysayer can stop progress in a nanosecond.  So what can you do?

Agree with them. Take their naysaying point of view and agree with it.  Then ask them how they would proceed if they were in charge, making the decision, offering the advice etc. Give them the lead role and sit back and listen.

For example, let’s say a mismatcher tells you that you meeting or blog post or presentation is awful, wrong, stinks etc. Agree with them.  “You’re absolutely right, this presentation sucks.  What would you do to make it better?”  Then sit back and wait.  A large percentage of the time the naysayer won’t have an answer. Plus your agreement makes their mismatching difficult to continue. If they swap sides, agree again, and just keep agreeing.  Agreement often takes the wind out of the sails of the naysayer.

The Bottom Line

Let’s face it. We all know naysayers. I meet them all the time in clients, in audiences,  in social media and in life.  I used to want to whack them up side the heads, especially when they took their mismatching to the personal and nasty level.

Life became so much easier once I realized that they can’t help themselves, it’s the way they are wired. It’s just a program running in the computer we call our mind. We can divert that program with a little thing called agreement. Sometimes it requires falling on your sword to agree with a naysayer, but the end result of moving forward and getting things accomplished is worth that sword play.

The next time some naysayers tell you how wrong, bad, out of touch or stupid you are- agree with them. Then sit back and listen for their next mismatch, and agree again. It won’t take long for the mismatching to stop and you’ll be able to move forward again.

3 Comments

  • Amber-Lee Dibble

    June 6, 2013 - 9:39 pm

    Rebel!
    Thank you!! I have been reading your posts on the Neuroscience, and find I am very interested. THIS post will help me keep a hold of my own temper, I am sure. It is the one thing I have been unable to curtail. My utter disgust when the “Mismatcher” just HAS to add the 2 cents (what a rip off) to every thought and plan. So, I will say thank you. This will give me a different approach to work with.

    • rebel brown

      June 15, 2013 - 8:52 am

      HI Amber-Lee

      I used to want to just slap all the mismatchers I come into contact with in work and in life. Then, after I learned about metaprograms and mismatching in my training – everything changed. One of the presuppositions I follow is that everyone has their own model of the world and unique programs – and we are all doing the best we can with the resources we have. Once I understood the mismatcher as a program – I stopped wanting to smack them and became enthralled in what triggers and increases this behavior. Then I had to learn how to adapt my own response to the mismatcher to see if we could find a middle ground where clear information was shared – rather than reactionary programs. Isn’t it amazing how a little bit of knowledge can completely change your perspective and your response?

      SO glad you enjoyed it and thanks for stopping by!

      reb

  • Marc Zazeela

    November 6, 2013 - 6:50 am

    Rebel,

    What you say speaks loudly about balance. I no more want to interact with someone who argues every point and disagrees with everything I say than I would want to interact with someone how is robotic in their agreement with everything too.

    People should speak their minds and voice their opinions so long as they are their own opinions and so long as they respect the opinions of others.

    Cheers,
    Marc

Leave A Reply